Les Whittington
Ottawa Bureau
Ottawa Bureau
OTTAWA—Prime Minister
Stephen Harper defended the investment protection agreement he signed with Bejiing,
saying it will even the playing field for Canadian companies wanting to invest
in China.
“For almost two
decades, Canadian governments have been trying to get a foreign investment
protection and promotion agreement with China for one very simple reason:
Canadian investors have not had the kind of protection in China that Chinese
investors have in Canada,”
Harper said during the question period in the Commons.
“This agreement allows
us to move forward. That is why it has seen an almost entirely positive
response from Canadian investors.”
The prime minister was
fielding questions on the Foreign
Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) he arranged with China, a pact that
could come into force as early as Thursday.
Opposition MPs say
parliamentarians should be given more time to vet the agreement, which is
designed to be unbreakable for at least 15 years (with a further 15 years
during which either country can back out on one year’s notice). The opposition
argues the agreement will give Chinese companies, including state-owned firms,
undue power to sue Canadian governments at any level for passing public health
or environmental regulations the investors deem discriminatory.
NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair
urged Harper to give MPs a chance to scrutinize the pact before it comes into
force. “The Conservatives have failed to consult Parliament or Canadians. They
are trying to tie the hands of Canadians for 31 years with no study, no debate
and no consultation,” Mulcair said. And he repeated that a future NDP
government would consider abrogating the treaty.
Harper said such a
move would be a mistake.
“The leader of the NDP
is saying he would revoke the hard-earned right of Canadian investors to be
protected in a marketplace like China,” he responded. “We know that China is an
important market. We know that Canadians need investment protection there. This
agreement does that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment