By: Kate Brumback
The Associated Press
NELSON, GEORGIA—Backers of a newly
adopted ordinance requiring gun ownership in a small U.S. town acknowledge they
were largely seeking to make a point about gun rights.
The ordinance in the city of Nelson,
Georgia — population 1,300 — was approved Monday night and goes into effect in
10 days. However, it contains no penalties and exempts anyone who objects,
convicted felons and those with certain mental and physical disabilities.
City Councilman Duane Cronic, who
sponsored the measure, said he knows the ordinance won’t be enforced but he
still believes it will make the town safer.
“I likened it to a security sign
that people put up in their front yards. Some people have security systems,
some people don’t, but they put those signs up,” he said. “I really felt like
this ordinance was a security sign for our city.”
Fears of a government crackdown on
gun sales have prompted a few communities around the United States to “require”
or recommend their residents arm themselves ever since a gunman killed 26
youngsters and educators Dec. 14 in a school in Newtown, Connecticut.
Such mandatory gun ownership
measures reflect a growing divide in the wake of the Newtown massacre as
President Barack Obama champions more gun control and the powerful National
Rifle Association gun lobby maintains that more guns keep people safer.
While lawmakers in generally more
liberal states with large urban centres like New York and California have moved
to tighten gun control laws, more conservative, rural areas in the American
heartland have been going in the opposite direction.
Council members in Nelson, a small
city located 80 kilometres north of Atlanta, voted unanimously to approve the
Family Protection Ordinance. The measure requires every head of household to
own a gun and ammunition to “provide for the emergency management of the city”
and to “provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the
city and its inhabitants.”
Nelson resident Lamar Kellett — one
of two people who opposed the ordinance during a public comment period Monday —
said it dilutes the city’s laws to pass measures that aren’t intended to be
enforced.
Kellett also said the ordinance will
have no effect, that it won’t encourage people like him who don’t want a gun to
go out and buy one.
Police Chief Heath Mitchell noted
that the city doesn’t have police officers who work 24 hours a day and is far
from the two sheriff’s offices that might send deputies in case of trouble, so
response times to emergency calls can be long. Having a gun would help
residents take their protection into their own hands, he said.
But the chief — the town’s sole
police officer — acknowledged the crime rate is very low. He mostly sees minor
property thefts and a burglary every few months. The most recent homicide was
more than five years ago, he said.
The ordinance is modeled after a
similar one adopted in 1982 by Kennesaw, an Atlanta suburb. City officials
there worried at the time that growth in Atlanta might bring crime to the
community, which now has about 30,000 residents. Kennesaw police have
acknowledged that their ordinance is difficult to enforce, and they haven’t
made any attempt to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment