London 2012
Disqualified badminton players unfairly punished for playing the long game
By Cathal Kelly
LONDON—Reflecting on
the decision of four badminton teams to throw their games here in order to get
a better playoff draw, the face of London 2012 spent Wednesday wagging his
finger.
“Depressing. Who wants
to sit through something like that?” LOCOG chief Sebastian Coe moaned. “It is
unacceptable.”
It’s an unseemly thing
for him to say. Depressing, to use his favoured epithet.
Coe long ago retired
from athletics, and instead switched over to a job in sales. It’s no longer
within his competence to judge what is or isn’t ethically acceptable behaviour
for people who still need to win in order to pay their rent.
Hours later, the
discipline’s governing body cravenly capitulated to public opinion (most of
that public presumably having never watched a game of badminton before in their
lives).
Four teams, including
the defending world champions, have been
tossed from the badminton competition for the sin of playing the long game instead of the short one.
What’s not at issue
here is that games were thrown.
The four pairs – two
from South Korea, and one each from China and Indonesia – embarked on an
amusing journey into true amateurism on Tuesday night.
Over and over, they
smashed the shuttlecock into the net. They put easy shots well wide. No rally
lasted more than four returns.
How would you look
competing in the Olympics? Now you know.
All four pairs were
trying to ease their draw going into the knockout round, where lesser teams
play each other before they meet the powerhouses. The Chinese, who have used
this strategy for years on the world badminton stage, wanted to ensure their
entrants could not meet before the gold-medal match.
If anyone’s to blame,
it is the organizers who decided to make this competition a round robin instead
of a straight elimination. You want maximum effort? You make every match count.
Otherwise, you introduce gamesmanship into the mix.
The ticket-buying
public was upset. Vocally so inside the venue (as usual for these Games, there
weren’t many of them there, so they couldn’t make too much fuss).
That seems to be the
real problem here. The gawkers didn’t reach their fun quota on Tuesday night.
If so, the ticket-buying public can go suck rocks.
The only people who
matter at the Olympics are the ones standing inside the lines of play. They’re
the ones doing what they are not paid to do – they are competing. At this level,
strategic losing is part of that.
It happens in most
sports, though more subtly. If they’re going to start booting every athlete who
takes it easy in a heat or a country that fields an under-strength squad in a
meaningless game, the next job for all the soldiers wandering around here is
switching out fatigues for spandex and beginning to compete.
If you want to watch
people playing for the sheer joy of doing so, I’m sure there’s a badminton club
somewhere within driving distance of wherever you live. Otherwise, leave what’s
acceptable behavior inside the game to those for whom it actually matters.
What Coe and all the
rest of the frothers are getting confused about here is the difference between
a spectacle and a show.
The Olympics are
entertaining. They are not entertainment.
Professional athletes
owe you their best every night. That’s what they’re getting paid to do.
Amateurs owe nothing to the crowd. This isn’t a circus. They’re not getting a
cut of the gate.
Amateurs are here to
represent their country and win medals. The national federations that pay their
subsistence wage are their bosses. They don’t care how good you look. They
don’t care how hard you tried. They care how much you win. Public sports
funding isn’t charity. It’s an extension of a nation’s foreign-policy
objectives. One of those is that you are hale enough to occasionally kick the
asses of your friends and enemies.
Putting aside all the
lip service paid to respecting the Olympic spirit (tell that to the guys
working at the doping labs), the highest goal here is to win within the
boundaries of the rules.
There is no rule in
any sport anywhere that says you have to be good. Otherwise, none of us would
play anything.
They play these Games
to win.
What is truly
depressing is that while undetected drug cheats will continue on here, a group
of competitors playing by the well-established rules of their small world have
been robbed of glory by people who didn’t know who they were before yesterday,
and will forget who they are in a few days time.
But for those eight
competitors, that hurt and the unfairness of being robbed by an angry,
disinterested mob, will last forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment